|
Copyright © 2002 California Association of REALTORS®
This 60-day notice requirement has already been in effect since January 1, 2002 for the cities of Los Angeles, Santa Monica, and West Hollywood. The Legislature has now extended the rule to apply to tenancies throughout the State of California. The legislative intent of this law is to accommodate tenants who may need more time in this tight rental market to make new housing arrangements. Hence, the 60-day notice requirement applies to landlords, whereas a tenant who terminates a periodic tenancy may do so with a 30-day notice. There are certain situations where the 60-day notice is not required. First, it does not apply if the landlord enters into a fixed-term lease, such as a one-year lease agreement. Second, a 30-day notice is sufficient for tenants who have lived in the property for less than one year. Third, landlords selling their properties may give a 30-day notice if all of the following six conditions are met:
Practice Tip : To terminate a tenancy, you may use C.A.R.’s standard form NTT entitled “Notice of Termination of Tenancy.” Source: California Senate Bill 1403 (Kuehl), amending
California Civil Code section 1946.1. To better protect a tenant’s rights when a landlord enters the leased premises, effective January 1, 2003, landlords must give written notice when entering for certain reasons. Under existing law, a landlord may enter the dwelling unit in the following situations: 1. In case of emergency. A landlord must now give the tenant reasonable notice in writing of the landlord’s intent to enter. Entry must be during normal business hours, unless the tenant otherwise consents. These written notice and business-hours-only requirements do not apply to cases of emergency, or when the tenant has abandoned or surrendered the premises. Twenty-four hours notice is presumed reasonable absent evidence to the contrary. The written notice may be served in any of the following ways: 1. Personal delivery to the tenant; To be prudent, a landlord should serve the entry notice in one of four methods prescribed above. However, these four methods are all described in the statute as permissible methods of service, and so, a court could arguably interpret the statutory language as allowing other reasonable methods of service as well. As an exception to the written notice requirement, a landlord selling his or her property can give the notice of entry orally, in person, or by telephone, if all of the following conditions are met:
Source: California Senate Bill 1403 (Kuehl), amending California Civil Code section 1954. C. Move-Out Inspection Rights Effective January 1, 2003, tenants have the right to request an inspection of the premises before they move out. This new law gives tenants an opportunity to correct any identified deficiencies in the condition of the property, and thereby minimize deductions, if any, from their security deposits. The new procedures for the move-out inspection are as follows:
a. Defaults in the payment of rent; This new law does not change the landlord’s existing duty to give the tenant, within three weeks after the tenant vacates the premises, an itemized statement of the final disposition of the security deposit. The landlord may use the security deposit for the following purposes: (a) Items set forth in the inspection statement that the tenant failed to correct; (b) Items arising between completion of the inspection and termination of the tenancy; and (c) Items not identified during the inspection due to the presence of the tenant’s possessions. Additional Considerations. It is unclear from the statutory language whether a landlord carrying out the move-out inspection procedures must also comply with the separate right-of-entry requirements (see section B above). The move-out inspection rules are primarily set forth in California Civil Code section 1950.5(f). However, the landlord’s right to enter the leased premises to conduct this move-out inspection has also been incorporated into the right-of-entry statute set forth in California Civil Code section 1954. Hence, a prudent landlord should, for the time being, comply with both statutes until the courts or the Legislature clarifies the following issues: 1. Waiver of 48-Hour Notice.
Section 1950.5(f) allows waiver of the 48-hour notice of inspection if
the waiver is in writing signed by both the landlord and tenant.
However, section 1954 independently requires the landlord to provide
written notice of the landlord’s intent to enter to conduct a move-out
inspection, and section 1954 does not explicitly allow waiver.
Thus, to be prudent, a landlord should provide written notice of an
upcoming inspection, and refrain from invoking the right to waive that
notice requirement until the courts or the Legislature clarifies this
issue. Source: California Assembly Bill 2330 (Migden), amending California Civil Code section 1950.5(f) and 1954. D. New Definition for Security Deposit Effective January 1, 2003, there is a new definition for a “security deposit.” A “security” used to be defined as any payment, fee, deposit or charge, including those imposed as an advance payment of rent. Under the new law, a security deposit also includes any charges imposed at the beginning of the tenancy to reimburse the landlord for costs associated with processing a new tenant, other than application screening fees (discussed below). This new definition is significant because a residential landlord may only collect a security deposit equal to two months of rent for unfurnished units, and three months of rent for furnished units. For example, for an unfurnished residential property at $800 per month under a month-to-month agreement, the maximum amount that the landlord can collect up front is $2,400, or $800 rent for the first month, plus $1,600 as a security deposit. If the landlord charges a $20 general processing fee, effective January 1, 2003, that $20 is considered as part of the $1,600 security deposit. A landlord cannot try to collect more than the allowable security deposit by labeling the funds as for something else, such as a move-in fee, pet fee, cleaning fee, or last month’s rent. There are, however, five exceptions to the rules limiting the amount of a security deposit:
Source: California Assembly Bill 2330 (Migden), amending California Civil Code section 1950.5(a). E. New Cleanliness Standard For all tenancies beginning after January 1, 2003, a landlord incurring costs to clean the premises after a tenant moves out, may only deduct from the security deposit the cleaning cost “necessary to return the unit to the same level of cleanliness it was in at inception of the tenancy.” For tenancies that began January 1, 2003 or earlier, the cleaning standard is more generally stated; that is, the landlord can deduct from the security deposit “the cleaning of the premises upon termination of the tenancy.” Source: California Assembly Bill 2330 (Migden), amending California Civil Code section 1950.5(b)(3). F. Bad Faith Claims of Security Deposits Under the previous law, a landlord who acted in bad faith in claiming or retaining a security deposit was subject to statutory damages up to $600, plus actual damages. Effective January 1, 2003, this statutory penalty will be changed from $600 to twice the amount of the security deposit, plus actual damages. A court may impose a statutory penalty against the landlord, even if the injured party does not specifically request such relief. The landlord bears the burden of proving the reasonableness of the amount of security deposit claimed. Source: California Assembly Bill 2330 (Migden),
amending California Civil Code section 1950.5(l). See our Referral Directory (the "Good Guys" list) for a list of attourneys that specialize in this area.
HomesSold4u | SanDiegoHomes4U | SDH4U.com | Encinitas | Oceanside | Cardiff |